There has been dozens of ideas, solutions and working papers surfaced time to time in the name of pragmatism and changing ground realities in order to imposed a foreign inspired agenda or political system over to Jammu and Kashmir. The bilateral treaties that had been concluded time to time whether an out-come of a war or a realization to improve bilateral relationship, never reflected an indigenous aspirations, urges, ideals and contradictions. There fore any agenda, plan or ideals that contradict indigenous realities would never produce any conditions conducive for a better environment. The situation in Jammu and Kashmir on both sides had been and has been gone bade to worse.

 

The concept of the United States of Kashmir; that reflect the declaration of our forefathers that was adopted during 1944, gaining ground for acceptance with every passing day and we hope that all stake-holders would ultimately converged around this idea. Though, there are much visible quarters even this day and age, unable to distinguish the inclusive values of human life from exclusive one, and see religion as a determining factor in theJinnah and Gandhi political landscape of Kashmir. They try to understand and visualize situation in an absolute and static terms by putting Jammu, Laddakh verses Valley of Kashmir (Imran Gazi facebook). They argued that Jammu and Laddakh, would never join and prefer to remain with Indian Union, because historically they had never been supportive of “liberation movement”. They further argued and in fact alleged that non-Muslim, popularly known as pundits of Kashmir valley, never supported the movement even at the time of Sheikh Abdullah, in fact, they had been the “collaborators and conspirators” of India. This line of thinking based on religo-historical prejudices pre-dominates in the Valley and similar prejudices among non-Muslims predominate in Jammu and Laddakh.. [read more]